RockNet Rockville City
Elections - 1997
Rockville

 Return to Rockville City Elections

Answers from the Candidates
 
for Mayor:
Rose G. Krasnow
Lih Y. Young
Vote for Council:
Robert E. (Bob) Dorsey
Glennon J. Harrison
Charles Haughey
James T. Marrinan
Robert (Bob) Wright
 
The candidates provided the answers to these questions.
RockNet is not responsible for the language or its accuracy.
 

 

For
Mayor
----
 return to top
Rose G. Krasnow
  1. Questions on the environment:
    1. Do you support the city of Rockville developing a formal environmental policy with standards at least as strict as the county's standards?
      Answer:
      I strongly believe that the City should adopt environmental guidelines. Having standards in place would put us in a much stronger position when developers come in with a proposal. It would be evident from the outset that Rockville places a high value on preserving the environment. Since developers always try to get the maximum value possible out a piece of land, it can be difficult, if not impossible, to persuade them to leave a stream or park buffer simply because it would be in the public interest. Once the standards are in place, any developer who comes in would know what is expected.

    2. Do you support creating an "environmental watchdog" position in the planning department?
      Answer:
      When I went to planning school in the mid 70's, environmental planning was a strong part of the curriculum. Today, as we experience problems such as the recent pfisteria outbreak, there can be no doubt in anyone's mind that we need to take stronger action to protect the environment. However, I am not yet convinced that we should hire an "environmental watchdog" in the planning department. In the first place, Public Works projects and Recreation and Parks projects often impact the environment as well. I think a major training effort to raise the environmental awareness of the entire staff might serve us better in the long run.

    3. If yes to either of the above, how do you plan to help implement the above changes?
      Answer:
      The City has recently put together an environmental guidelines group to start developing the standards mentioned in part a above. My only regret is that it has taken us longer to get to this point than I had hoped. Early in my term as Mayor, I asked staff to develop guidelines regarding stream and park buffers, primarily because I was disturbed that the City allowed the townhouses known as the Villages at Tower Oaks to be built so close to the Dogwood Park ballfield. Clearly, such guidelines would have been helpful with respect to the development of Chestnut Lodge and other properties. Now that the guidelines group has been formed, I am confident that some results should be forthcoming in the near future.

  2. Can any lessons be learned from the annexation and development of the King Farm? If yes, how will you apply them in the next few years?
    Answer:
    The annexation of the King Farm was a unique situation. The City wanted the King Farm to be part of Rockville. Its development will strengthen our tax base for years to come. Several new parks will be created at a time when the City is experiencing a shortage of ball fields and other recreational space. Moreover, given the high density levels that had already been established by the County, the City wanted more control over the impacts of such a development. It's also important to remember that a bankruptcy court was involved, so we had to proceed fairly quickly and the annexation document was more specific than most.. Given all these considerations, I think the annexation agreement came out quite well. My only real concern is that we probably should have collected a larger sum of money to mitigate some of the traffic impacts.

  3. How should the Council and Mayor proceed in handling the County/City disagreement over the use of the Seven Locks Road's jail?
    Answer:
    It is very difficult to discuss what the City should do with respect to the Seven Locks Detention Center, since it is a sensitive legal matter that has not yet been resolved. However, let me state that I think the County is wrong to refuse to acknowledge the legitimate safety concerns of the neighbors who live in the vicinity of the jail. For years, the County has made promises to the City that it refuses to honor. While the number of beds may actually go down once the jail is open in Clarksburg, the number of releases into the neighborhood will increase substantially. At a minimum, I believe the County must commit to implementing at least some of the suggestions proposed by the Planning Commission in order to enhance the sense of security for anyone who lives near the facility.

  4. Private residents are now paying a larger portion of property taxes than commercial properties. What implications for Rockville's planning do you draw from this fact?
    Answer:
    With the improvement in the economy, I think we will see a reversal in this trend, so that business will carry a greater share of the tax burden. In the early 90's, growth slowed to a standstill. Many existing commercial properties appealed their tax assessments and were granted significant reductions. In addition, the downtown mall was torn down, which caused another significant drop in tax revenues. In contrast, we are now seeing the redevelopment of numerous businesses on the Pike (i.e. Congressional and Congressional North). Occupancy rates in office buildings are improving. Movie theaters are being built downtown. Our new nonprofit economic development corporation will also help us bring new business to the city.

  5. Questions on Rockville housing:
    1. Assess the availability of low and moderate income housing in Rockville?
      Answer:
      Rockville actually has a greater proportion of low and moderate income housing than many other areas of the County. This is due in part to the greater age of some of our housing stock. In addition, we have worked with groups such as the Montgomery Housing Partnership to create subsidized housing projects such as Beall's Grant. We also worked closely with the County to insure that the Blandford Apartments would continue to serve a lower income population. Although the rents will be higher than before, the units will only be offered to those making 60% or less of the median county income. Our Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit Ordinance is also being put into effect with the development of Chestnut Lodge and the King Farm. 12 1/2% of these new housing units will be MPDU's.

    2. What role should the Mayor and Council play in maintaining existing low or moderate income housing in Rockville?
      Answer:
      I think the city should work to revitalize some of our older neighborhoods to insure that they remain desirable places to live. In addition, we should seek out some public-private partnerships that would be beneficial to all. Many large employers in Rockville have made it clear that they have a hard time attracting the new employees they need because of the high cost of housing. We should work together to create new moderate housing opportunities.

  6. During the last two years, what was your greatest contribution to the city of Rockville?
    Answer:
    I think my greatest contribution as Mayor is that I have challenged the status quo in order to raise the level of service being provided by the City. We cannot live on our past reputation. Technology is changing, the demographics of Rockville are changing, our environment is changing. Even while on the Council, I asked a lot of tough questions. As Mayor, I have moved rapidly ahead to institute a number of new initiatives, including our Walking Town Meetings, a non-profit economic development corporation, and "Imagine Rockville". Staff is fully aware that our level of expectation has changed. This Mayor and Council demands thorough, objective responses to issues so that the decisions we make will be the best ones for our city.
---- For
Mayor
----
 return to top
Lih Y. Young
  1. Questions on the environment:
    1. Do you support the city of Rockville developing a formal environmental policy with standards at least as strict as the county's standards?
    2. Do you support creating an "environmental watchdog" position in the planning department?
    3. If yes to either of the above, how do you plan to help implement the above changes?
      Answer:
      Yes. Support: environmental policy, and an environmental watchdog or liaison on environmental issues. Protect people's health; maintain air quality, clean water; avoid harmful effects from poisoning: lead, chemical, pesticides, toxic materials; preserve natural resources: recycle materials; plan on land use. The liaison, as a major planner, devises plans; coordinate inputs from various government agencies and environmental groups; participate, monitor and review the plans and planing process; testify on: growth management, annual growth policy.

  2. Can any lessons be learned from the annexation and development of the King Farm? If yes, how will you apply them in the next few years?
    Answer:
    Yes. Elect a NEW quality mayor: leadership, responsibility, reasoning, cost-effectiveness, justice, commitment. Protect: people's rights, resources, family, community, peace. Improve voter education, people's inputs. Telecast issues/candidate forum, real town hall meetings without threats, coersion like current system. Display, disseminate, and maintain candidate information: equitably, meaningfully. Eliminate fake democracy, unfair election process, obstruction of campaign: by officials, IRS, law enforcement, financial services, fraudulent and criminal networks. See other Questions.

  3. How should the Council and Mayor proceed in handling the County/City disagreement over the use of the Seven Locks Road's jail?
    Answer:
    Oppose a new jail. For safer community, redirect budget to priorities: government accountability, education, economic security, public safety; with prevention, diagnosis, cost-effectiveness, real democracy, fair election process; provide nourishing, peaceful and educational environment; protect children, self-esteem, family, resources; eliminate brutality, retaliation, double standards, frivolous and disparate treatments, improper processing of complaints, cruel tyranny by officials, IRS, law enforcement, fraudulent and criminal networks. See other questions.

  4. Private residents are now paying a larger portion of property taxes than commercial properties. What implications for Rockville's planning do you draw from this fact?
    Answer:
    Reduce people's burden, increase the value of tax dollars, restore people's trust. Coordinate: various governments; redirect budgets priorities: government accountability, education, economic security, public safety. Eliminate: waste, abuse, unlawful acts against people and business by officials, IRS, related fraudulent and criminal networks. Support: tax cut, tax credits for low income, affordable housing, library services, civilian review on law enforcement. Strengthen: complaint processing, implementation of laws. See other questions.

  5. Questions on Rockville housing:
    1. Assess the availability of low and moderate income housing in Rockville?
    2. What role should the Mayor and Council play in maintaining existing low or moderate income housing in Rockville?
      Answer:
      Coordinate with agencies at various levels of government. Support affordable housing, tax credit to low income; prevent discrimination. Strengthen the board/commission on human relation, fair housing, lending practices. Increase people's inputs, comments and complaints. Eliminate bureaucracy, abuse of power, unlawful acts among officials, IRS, law enforcement, legal system, financial services, related fraudulent and criminal networks, which deprive of people's rights, properties, resources; destroying family, credit, reputation. See other questions.

  6. During the last two years, what was your greatest contribution to the city of Rockville?
    Answer:
    "Challenge & Change, People & Children First!" Promote: liberties, justice, equality, effective gov't & law enforcement. Protect people, business: rights, resources, reputation. Testified before legislators, law enforcement, public hearings: redirect budgets-priorities; devoted to eliminate waste, abuse, brutality, unlawful acts, fake democracy, cruel tyranny - among officials, IRS, law enforcement, legal system, financial services, fraudulent & criminal networks (which cause social problems, people-slaves). Make community: better, safer: now, future. See other questions.
---- For
Council
----
 return to top
Robert E. (Bob) Dorsey
  1. Questions on the environment:
    1. Do you support the city of Rockville developing a formal environmental policy with standards at least as strict as the county's standards?
      Answer:
      YES. Of course we need to determine what is meant by "strict". I feel we need a certain amount of appropriate flexibility, yet there needs to be clear comprehensive standards. A clearly defined well presented policy will be most effective and avoid challenges based on misunderstanding. Comprehensive standards will also help maintain our city's reputation for respect for nature without any citizen being accused of being a zealot or environmental eccentric.

    2. Do you support creating an "environmental watchdog" position in the planning department?
      Answer:
      We need a watchdog, but I don't feel a watchdog can be optimally effective as an internal staff position with the potential for mixed loyalties. Watchdog entities are most effective with a bit of independence and sovereignty. Maybe a trusted consultant on retainer can be effective and impartial.

    3. If yes to either of the above, how do you plan to help implement the above changes?
      Answer:
      I support the documenting of standards so everyone involved can understand their limitations before investing too much time and/or money in a project which has potential adverse impact on the environment.

  2. Can any lessons be learned from the annexation and development of the King Farm? If yes, how will you apply them in the next few years?
    Answer:
    YES. Much can be learned from any situation, pleasant or unpleasant. From the King Farm experience we can learn a lot about developing notification techniques to better inform interested parties of pending development. We can learn how to better enhance our city as the ideal place to live and work. In order to achieve a favorable balance from the tax and revenue perspectives, we need to promote appropriate development that includes commercial as well as residential.

  3. How should the Council and Mayor proceed in handling the County/City disagreement over the use of the Seven Locks Road's jail?
    Answer:
    Obviously public safety must be the top priority, but we should proceed in a manner that does not jeopardize the Clarksburg Jail progress. We should avoid provoking an environment of friction between the various levels of government. The city, county and state elected officials need to better understand what is at stake as a result of any decision or indecision. We must work toward an environment of dialogue that keeps appropriate options on the table without compromising the safety and peace of mind of the citizens of Rockville.

  4. Private residents are now paying a larger portion of property taxes than commercial properties. What implications for Rockville's planning do you draw from this fact?
    Answer:
    The implications are that we must find ways to promote a shift toward businesses carrying more of the load. This must be accomplished by attracting new business and not punishing existing businesses. The Economic Development Corporation will take us a long way in the right direction for attracting new businesses. The Chamber of Commerce will continue to promote retention of existing businesses. The mayor and council and city staff must continue to help citizens understand as much as possible about how to bring this into better balance without damaging the Rockville quality of life. A well informed citizenry can make valuable intellectual contributions to the decisions associated with which businesses should be allowed to locate in Rockville.

  5. Questions on Rockville housing:
    1. Assess the availability of low and moderate income housing in Rockville?
    2. What role should the Mayor and Council play in maintaining existing low or moderate income housing in Rockville?
      Answer:
      The availability of low and moderate income housing in Rockville is low and moderate. To a great extent this is a regional problem. The Washington Metropolitan Area is an expensive place to live. The demand for the quality of life offered by Rockville creates a market situation where very little low and moderate income housing is available. There are precious few low and moderate income housing opportunities. A home in Rockville is a highly valued and priced item. The mayor and council can support and promote programs like REACH and Habitat for Humanity, that attempt to fairly administer housing opportunities. Continuing to promote a cooperative and supportive relationship between city, the Rockville Housing Authority, county housing agencies, and other public and private housing advocates is a crucial role the mayor and council can play.

  6. During the last two years, what was your greatest contribution to the city of Rockville?
    Answer:
    My willingness to listen, be fair and not make decisions based on personal or preconcieved notions.
---- For
Council
----
 return to top
Glennon J. Harrison
  1. Questions on the environment:
    1. Do you support the city of Rockville developing a formal environmental policy with standards at least as strict as the county's standards?
      Answer:
      Yes, I believe that the City should adopt a formal environmental policy that is as strict or stricter than the County's policy. Rockville must take active steps to protect and enhance the many environmental elements that are so crucial to maintaining a high quality of life in our City and, by extension, in Montgomery County. Rock Creek, Cabin John Creek, and Watts Branch all originate in Rockville and are extremely sensitive watersheds of the Potomac. Watts Branch flows into the Potomac River just above much of the Washington areas' water supply. The farms that once surrounded Rockville are disappearing and sprawl is now a great challenge to all of us in the County. There's no point in having lower standards unless we want to become a dumping ground for every ill-conceived use out there.

    2. Do you support creating an "environmental watchdog" position in the planning department?
      Answer:
      I await a recommendation from the Environmental Guidelines Group (see part c. below) about how to accomplish the goal of getting solid advice and guidance on environmental issues. Some issues are technically challenging and I want to know that we have access to the advice whether or not the person (watchdog?) is on staff. I am less concerned with where bodies sit in City Hall than I am with getting advice and guidance that is objective and that fairly states the issues.

    3. If yes to either of the above, how do you plan to help implement the above changes?
      Answer:
      The current Mayor and Council is in the process of appointing an Environmental Guidelines Group (EGG) to recommend a set of guidelines that we intend to adopt formally in the near future. The group will also study the possibility of having an environmentalist on staff or retaining an environmental consulting group to provide information and guidance on environmental questions.

  2. Can any lessons be learned from the annexation and development of the King Farm? If yes, how will you apply them in the next few years?
    Answer:
    Yes, whether you are a citizen or Councilmember, pay careful attention to large development projects. While developer interests may coincide with yours, never assume they have your interests at heart. Keep on top of development proposals and work with your local government to make sure it is considering your point of view. In the case of the King Farm (KF), many of the issues that most concerned citizens were set in stone in 1995 before I was elected to the Council. The King Farm annexation agreement sets many of the terms for development and citizens did not really have a chance to carefully examine, understand, or comment on an extremely complex agreement. I am committed to doing a better job to inform and educate residents about all of our development options. I will also work hard to insure that the King Farm does not impose burdens on any other part of the City.

  3. How should the Council and Mayor proceed in handling the County/City disagreement over the use of the Seven Locks Road's jail?
    Answer:
    The reuse issue is one of the most serious questions facing Rockville as a City. The City and the citizens of Rockville need to turn our attention to County officials, especially the County Council. We cannot allow the County to put uses on the jail site that threaten the general safety and well being of our citizens. I strongly support the Planning Commission's action to deny the use-permit for the Central Processing Unit. The Mayor and Council will continue to work for a satisfactory resolution to this issue. Meanwhile, I advise concerned residents to voice their concerns to members of the County Council.

  4. Private residents are now paying a larger portion of property taxes than commercial properties. What implications for Rockville's planning do you draw from this fact?
    Answer:
    Since FY 1993, the assessed valuation of residential real estate has equaled or exceeded commercial real estate. A large number of commercially zoned properties are currently undeveloped. If developed, commercial real estate would contribute a proportionally larger share to city coffers. We have pretty much reached our growth boundaries, so any rebalancing of the ratio between commercial and residential must be accomplished on land that is already within City limits. More important than the balance, however, is ensuring that the quality and type of development in Rockville contributes to OUR community (e.g., a lively town center area that people want to go to).

  5. Questions on Rockville housing:
    1. Assess the availability of low and moderate income housing in Rockville?
      Answer:
      There is a shortage of affordable homes for people with low and moderate incomes in Rockville. This is equally true for the County and for the entire Washington metropolitan area. This situation has existed for many years and solutions have eluded officials at the federal, state, and local levels. There is no unique Rockville solution: we need to work closely with public and private agencies throughout the region to create new opportunities for affordable housing.

    2. What role should the Mayor and Council play in maintaining existing low or moderate income housing in Rockville?
      Answer:
      The current Mayor and Council helped find a solution to a crisis in affordable housing last year when millionaire philanthropist Betty Brown Casey decided to close the Blandford Apartments rather than bring them into compliance with the fire code. Through a lot of work with the County and the State, we made sure that the Blandford (operating under new ownership) will continue to provide persons with moderate incomes a safe, affordable place to live. The Mayor and Council also took action to insure that the Board of Commissioners of the Rockville Housing Authority (RHA) is working to accomplish its mission rather than playing politics with the lives of the residents of the RHA.

  6. During the last two years, what was your greatest contribution to the city of Rockville?
    Answer:
    Greatest? I'm not about to describe anything I've done in such superlative terms. I've done a lot that I'm happy with, including: RockNet... The City's web site and email access to City Hall... I was an early advocate for the City's visioning process (Imagine Rockville)... getting the economic development folks out of the Planning Department... reorganizing and refocusing the City's planning department... neighborhood-oriented planning... the King Farm "pump around" and tree preservation in the Upper Watts Branch... better stormwater management... Twinbrook Community Center... improved City-Lincoln Park relationship. The thing that I liked best about the last two years was the opportunity to serve my fellow citizens. I hope that we achieved better communications, improved our neighborhoods, and developed new ways to bring the entire community closer together. I feel like I make a difference. It has been a real honor and privilege to serve on the Council.
---- For
Council
----
 return to top
Charles Haughey
  1. Questions on the environment:
    1. Do you support the city of Rockville developing a formal environmental policy with standards at least as strict as the county's standards?
      Answer:
      Yes, the City is in need of consistent, rigorous standards for managing and protecting our environment. I advocate (and would work for) an high-priority effort to establish and apply such standards to all City planning activities. Clearly, we need to review County standards and those of other municipalities (e.g. Takoma Park) to devise our own equal or stricter standards. Once established, those standards must be applied to all formal planning and zoning endeavors, preferably by creating a new Rockville zoning ordinance grounded in environmental planning. Other municipalities have adopted environmental zoning codes; despite our advanced level of build-out, it is not too late for Rockville to do so.

    2. Do you support creating an "environmental watchdog" position in the planning department?
      Answer:
      Rockville needs to employ a trained and capable environmental advocate to work with boards, commissions and citizens groups and across the City's departmental lines to devise and enforce appropriate environmental provisions in all City activities. This position should not be encumbered by the City's bureaucracy but should work directly with the City Manager and should be a pro-active advocate for our environment rather than being limited to a watch-dog role. Even if such a role is established, the City's elected officials should be more responsive to the concerns of our people. It should not take a frustrated crowd of over 200 people to make the Council attentive to environmental concerns.

    3. If yes to either of the above, how do you plan to help implement the above changes?
      Answer:
      The Mayor and Council have the authority to adopt the regulations they judge necessary to safeguard our environment. I believe the changes we need must be implemented through decisive, formal Council action and be monitored vigilantly and directly by the Council. That process should include working through a citizens' commission to review and develop plans, to oversee staff analyses and to develop ordinance language for council action.

  2. Can any lessons be learned from the annexation and development of the King Farm? If yes, how will you apply them in the next few years?
    Answer:
    The over-riding lesson is that the City government and staff lack the experience and skill to manage such a large-scale development effectively. Rockville should never allow itself to be so rushed by circumstances that it hurries into formal legal arrangements without adequate review by objective and specialized legal counsel. We should always give the public adequate time to respond to the City's proposed course of action and to develop and offer testimony that represents informed citizen opinion. Elected officials should work with neighborhoods on specific implementation issues to avoid problems of the kind associated with the King Farm sewer line options. Finally, Council endorsement of a concept plan should never abrogate the City's authority to approve or disapprove detailed development plans.

  3. How should the Council and Mayor proceed in handling the County/City disagreement over the use of the Seven Locks Road's jail?
    Answer:
    First, the City should specify what it wants and what it is willing to contribute to arrange a satisfactory settlement (e.g. CPU within Rockville but not intruding in either residential or prime commercial areas) over a reasonable time. The time frame for a solution and transition is probably in excess of five years and the cost to taxpayers may be substantial (but necessary) in order to accommodate the needs of Rockville's people and neighborhoods. Second, we should conduct open, public, good-faith negotiations with the County's elected officials to secure an agreement that is satisfactory to Rockville's people both as citizens of Rockville and as citizens of Montgomery County.

  4. Private residents are now paying a larger portion of property taxes than commercial properties. What implications for Rockville's planning do you draw from this fact?
    Answer:
    Our economic development process should redress any imbalance over time but that process needs to be realistic and sensitive both to neighborhood concerns and to the likelihood that it will take substantial time to attain an ideal balance. The City already has a 3 to 1 ratio of jobs to households that translates into a very substantial number of people traveling into Rockville every day to work. The result is increasingly heavy traffic with high auto emissions. Overall, we need a more balanced approach to growth -- no more growth for growth's sake. Quality of life for Rockville's current citizens should take priority over more growth and increased density.

  5. Questions on Rockville housing:
    1. Assess the availability of low and moderate income housing in Rockville?
      Answer:
      First, we need a comprehensive inventory -- a thorough assessment -- of low- and moderately-priced housing stock, identified by location. With that inventory in hand, we can begin to make truly informed, intelligent policy decisions about low- and moderately-priced housing. At that point, we will be able to devise a plan to determine what can best serve Rockville's communities and neighborhoods.

    2. What role should the Mayor and Council play in maintaining existing low or moderate income housing in Rockville?
      Answer:
      The primary role of the Mayor and Council is to make certain that all City regulations concerning the maintenance of low- and moderately-priced housing (or any housing for that matter) are rigorously enforced. Beyond that, we face a policy question -- to be determined in the planning process described above -- as to how City government should work with developers regarding the addition of low- or moderately-priced housing.

  6. During the last two years, what was your greatest contribution to the city of Rockville?
    Answer:
    I am still pursuing what may be my biggest contribution to our City -- running as the ONLY INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE in this year's election for City Council. We desperately need -- now more than ever -- active, dedicated and determined leadership. By campaigning, I've ensured that voters will have an opportunity to consider issues and determine who leads Rockville next and I've been able to point out changes needed in City operations. As Planning Commission Chair in 1996, I initiated a review of significant zoning p provisions, improved processes for conducting Commission meetings, pressed for Commission access to direct legal advice and for TV coverage on critical issues and led review of the County's Central Processing Unit application which culminated in rejection of its use permit.
---- For
Council
----
 return to top
James T. Marrinan
  1. Questions on the environment:
    1. Do you support the city of Rockville developing a formal environmental policy with standards at least as strict as the county's standards?
      Answer:
      There is a clear need to develop a formal environmental policy for the City of Rockville, including specific standards that in all likelihood should be at least as strict as those of Montgomery Co. City staff have been asked by the Mayor and Council to start that policy development process and complete it as soon as possible.

    2. Do you support creating an "environmental watchdog" position in the planning department?
      Answer:
      The City of Rockville needs an in-house environmental expert to advise not only the Planning Department but all city units about environmental issues. This position should be organizationally positioned so that it is available to all city staff and can also monitor city activities. City staff were directed by the Mayor and Council to establish such a position and at least initially a consultant will be hired to perform this role until a permanent position is created.

    3. If yes to either of the above, how do you plan to help implement the above changes?
      Answer:
      See above.

  2. Can any lessons be learned from the annexation and development of the King Farm? If yes, how will you apply them in the next few years?
    Answer:
    We learn from every experience and clearly the annexation and development of the King Farm made us more aware of sewer capacity and environmental issues to name just a few. These lessons learned will be extremely helpful as the Thomas Farm is developed and additional annexations occur in the next few years.

  3. How should the Council and Mayor proceed in handling the County/City disagreement over the use of the Seven Locks Road's jail?
    Answer:
    The Montgomery Co. Detention Center issue is extremely complex. The good news is that a new jail is scheduled to be built in Clarksburg starting next year. This is a long-term goal of the City but there are some on the County Council who want to reverse that decision before construction actually starts. The re-use of the Seven Locks Road property issue might give them that opportunity if this entire issue is not handled carefully. At this time, it is best to coordinate our activities with the Office of the County Executive while we continue to stress the security concerns of the surrounding neighborhoods and attain certain improvements in the upcoming County budget.

  4. Private residents are now paying a larger portion of property taxes than commercial properties. What implications for Rockville's planning do you draw from this fact?
    Answer:
    Clearly, we need a better balance between residential and commercial property tax revenues. One initiative of the Mayor and Council is to actively contest the property tax appeals of commercial property owners that for the past few years have been mindlessly approved and lowered by the State. It is the City's long-standing policy that commercial property tax revenue should be the primary source of funds to pay for city services.

  5. Questions on Rockville housing:
    1. Assess the availability of low and moderate income housing in Rockville?
    2. What role should the Mayor and Council play in maintaining existing low or moderate income housing in Rockville?
      Answer:
      The City has made consistent progress in providing low and moderate income housing in Rockville but the need continues. In the past few years, we have enacted the Moderately Priced dwelling Unit and Grandparent Unit ordinances, as well as helped re-structure the Rockville Housing Authority. Compared to nearby jurisdictions, Rockville is doing a good job. However, we need to look at our zoning ordinances to determine if additional development incentives can be incorporated to address this on-going need.

  6. During the last two years, what was your greatest contribution to the city of Rockville?
    Answer:
    As the longest serving member of the Mayor and Council, I see myself as the institutional memory to this body helping newer members understand not only the history of policy issues but the necessary procedural steps we need to undertake. I have focused my attention on revenue and community service issues to insure that our excellent city services continue and where possible improve.
---- For
Council
----
 return to top
Robert (Bob) Wright
  1. Questions on the environment:
    1. Do you support the city of Rockville developing a formal environmental policy with standards at least as strict as the county's standards?
      Answer:
      Yes.

    2. Do you support creating an "environmental watchdog" position in the planning department?
      Answer:
      No.

    3. If yes to either of the above, how do you plan to help implement the above changes?
      Answer:
      The City staff is currently in the process of developing environmental guidelines that Mayor and Council would adopt as a part of the City's environmental policy. Also Mayor and Council have formed an Environmental Guidelines Group to provide for public comment on those guidelines. I anticipate those guidelines coming before Mayor and Council for adoption in June 1998. I do not support the "watchdog" approach as a management practice. It's too often viewed as a "police state." I believe a champion for the environment is a better management approach. The champion's charge should extend beyond the planning department. In addition the City's senior managers need to incorporate into the daily practices of every staff member the recognition that they have a responsibility for our environment.

  2. Can any lessons be learned from the annexation and development of the King Farm? If yes, how will you apply them in the next few years?
    Answer:
    Yes. I believe the lesson learned is not to use the annexation agreement as either the vehicle or as a substitute for the planning process with its public input. Detailed annexation agreements limit the ability of the City to act at a later date. Today we are applying this lesson learned to pending annexations into the City.

  3. How should the Council and Mayor proceed in handling the County/City disagreement over the use of the Seven Locks Road's jail?
    Answer:
    We need to work with the County Executive and the County Council to see that they address the concerns of the residents in the neighborhoods surrounding the County site on Seven Locks Road. A jail and a central processing unit (CPU) should not be located in a residential area. First, we must insure that construction of the jail in Clarksburg begins. Second, going to court against the County has to be carefully contrived. We must assess the risk of a Court decision that says the County, as a higher level of government, does not have to comply with City codes. Current and future County Executives and Councils would point to this court decision and ignore the City, not only with regard to the current jail and CPU, but with the numerous other County uses in the City as well.

  4. Private residents are now paying a larger portion of property taxes than commercial properties. What implications for Rockville's planning do you draw from this fact?
    Answer:
    I believe sustainable fiscal health for the City requires a roughly even balance between residential and commercial property taxes. In 1993 we were at that balance. Today, the proportions for property tax revenue are slightly greater than 60% and slightly less than 40% for residential and commercial, respectfully. I believe we must watch this trend closely, but the future for returning to an even balance between residential and commercial property tax revenue is favorable. The City and Rockville businesses have formed the Greater Rockville Partnership to select and promote targeted economic development within the City. The town center will develop over the next several years beginning with the retail pavilion which will open in 1998. The IBEW property on the corner of Middle Lane and Hungerford Drive will eventually be developed. Over 3 million square feet of commercial space is available in the King Farm. Tower Oaks and the PEPCO property on Gude Road remain to be developed. It's only a matter of time.

  5. Questions on Rockville housing:
    1. Assess the availability of low and moderate income housing in Rockville?
      Answer:
      Rockville is quite diverse with regard to the price of its housing stock. In the City I believe there is readily available moderate-income housing, and to a lesser degree low-income housing. However, I am concerned that the moderate- and low-income housing is concentrated in specific locations within the City. I prefer it to be more dispersed. The King Farm will add substantially to our moderate-income housing stock.

    2. What role should the Mayor and Council play in maintaining existing low or moderate income housing in Rockville?
      Answer:
      I believe Mayor and Council should put in place more programs that encourage and assist owners and tenants to maintain and improve their houses. We should provide incentives to upgrade the existing housing stock. Moderately Priced Dwelling Units (MPDU's) in new developments receive much attention, but it's the existing housing stock that requires new and innovative program initiatives.

  6. During the last two years, what was your greatest contribution to the city of Rockville?
    Answer:
    My greatest contribution is the furtherance of citizen involvement. On numerous occasions during the last two years I have been both in the neighborhoods and at the City open houses on various projects. On those occasions I encouraged citizens to become activists and to champion their positions. It's been challenging, for example, the Watts Branch sewer upgrade, but more positively, Imagine Rockville involved many residents for the first time. Today the City has more residents actively involved then ever before. With more involved residents there is a greater diversity of opinions, which is necessary and helpful. I will continue to promote citizen involvement, as I believe it results in better City government.

 Return to Top
 Return to Rockville City Elections
 Return to Government/Elections
 Return to RockNet Home Page

© 1997 Rockville Community Network
Feedback: comments@rocknet.org
Last Updated: October 10, 1997